Virtue Signalling and The End of an Old Work Horse's [War]

 https://youtu.be/oQcfsAha7iw?si=qzI9oqr_PHtXBLKs


Notes for a corollary.

 🧠 Part I: The Apologist Through Nature’s Mirror

To grapple with human nature and the animal kingdom in search of the apologist’s essence is to ask: what instincts, what social behaviors, what survival strategies inform the act of defending the indefensible?

  • Human Nature: The apologist often operates from a place of cognitive dissonance—reconciling moral discomfort with loyalty, ideology, or fear. This mirrors the human tendency to rationalize behavior that preserves group cohesion or personal identity.

  • Animal Kingdom: In nature, defense mechanisms range from camouflage to mimicry to submission. The apologist may resemble the submissive beta, who defends the alpha’s actions to maintain social order, or the mimic, who adopts the dominant narrative to avoid conflict.

  • Ethical Implication: The apologist isn’t merely a mouthpiece—they’re a moral contortionist, often caught between survival and conscience. Their quality lies not in truth-telling, but in narrative preservation.


🗺️ Part II: The Annexed Territory’s Claim to Governance

Now, how does an annexed territory justify its continued governance? This is where the apologist’s logic often becomes institutionalized.

  • Historical Legitimacy: The territory may invoke ancient ties, cultural continuity, or historical grievances. These are often selectively curated to support the narrative of rightful rule.

  • Security and Stability: Governance is framed as a necessity to prevent chaos, protect minorities, or maintain infrastructure—appealing to utilitarian ethics.

  • International Law vs. Realpolitik: While annexation may violate international norms, the territory might argue that de facto control, economic integration, and diplomatic recognition override legal objections.

  • Narrative Sovereignty: The most potent claim is often rhetorical: “We are not occupiers—we are restorers.” This reframing turns annexation into redemption, and governance into stewardship.


Would you like to explore how this plays out in a specific historical or speculative scenario? We could model a fictional annexation and test its rhetorical scaffolding—or even draft an apologist’s manifesto from within that system.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

To: start the clock

Running with the Bulls. Medieval tales from the North of Spain.

Chinese Made Electric Vehicles and More