Perusal / Perusual what is the different/ce*
https://youtu.be/9JqGyoAsmDo?si=fEX8ve-kpDuAfO9R
Next Up. How to determine the future of the world by shopping for groceries with a superior mindset.
This is a rich and layered question, Manu—one that invites us to trace the sinews of trade, narrative, and ideology across hemispheres. Let’s unpack it in two parts: Argentina’s economic dependence on beef exports to North America, and how the media-political response to its crisis might be reframed through the lens of commodity-dependent epistemologies.
🥩 Is Argentina dependent on beef sales to North America?
Short answer: Not primarily. While beef is a significant export, North America is not Argentina’s main market.
- China dominates: Over 70% of Argentina’s beef exports go to China USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. Cuts like frozen forequarter blocks and lean processing beef are in high demand there.
- Europe and Israel follow, with niche markets for kosher and high-quality chilled cuts Beef Central.
- The U.S. is a minor player: As of 2025, Argentina accounts for only about 2.1% of U.S. beef imports, mostly lean beef for ground meat Drovers. Even if U.S. imports doubled, it would barely dent U.S. supply or significantly shift Argentina’s export profile.
So while beef is a strategic export, Argentina’s economic dependency on North American beef sales is limited. The real story lies in how beef exports are leveraged politically, especially amid Milei’s economic reforms and U.S. bailouts.
🧠Reframing the crisis: What can commodity-dependent thinkers reveal?
Here’s where your question gets incisive. Argentina’s crisis isn’t just about inflation or trade—it’s about how dependency is narrated, normalized, and resisted.
🛢️ Commodity dependence as structural vulnerability
According to UNCTAD, countries where 60%+ of export revenue comes from commodities are more prone to:
- Volatility from global price swings
- Overvalued currencies that hollow out domestic industries
- Political instability as elites capture resource rents and external actors (like the IMF or U.S.) exert leverage UNCTAD
Argentina fits this mold—not just with beef, but also soy, lithium, and grain. The “plight” of commodity-dependent thinkers is that they’re often trapped in cycles of extraction and external validation, with little room for endogenous development.
📰 Media and political narratives: The mirage of “miracle”
Mainstream media has at times framed Milei’s austerity as an “economic miracle” ZNetwork | MSN, despite rising poverty, hunger, and social unrest. This narrative:
- Obscures the costs of deregulation and foreign debt
- Legitimizes external bailouts as necessary interventions
- Marginalizes dissenting voices, especially from unions, Indigenous communities, and local producers
Commodity-dependent thinkers—those attuned to how value is extracted and who gets to narrate crisis—might instead ask:
- Who benefits from calling this a “miracle”?
- What forms of knowledge are excluded when economic health is measured only in GDP or inflation rates?
- How do cultural, ecological, and communal losses register in these metrics?
🧠Toward a more grounded response
To “determine better” responses, we might:
- Center epistemologies of the dispossessed: What do smallholder farmers, Indigenous land stewards, or informal workers say about the crisis?
- Map counter-infrastructures: How are communities building resilience outside state-market binaries—through cooperatives, barter economies, or cultural regeneration?
- Deconstruct media dependency: As media dependency theory suggests, in times of instability, audiences become more reliant on dominant narratives Britannica. Recognizing this opens space for alternative storytelling and civic performance.
Would you like to sketch a scenario where Argentina’s beef economy is reimagined through circular or community-controlled models? Or perhaps explore how Boorloo’s own counter-infrastructure work might resonate with Argentina’s moment?
https://youtu.be/-orFtcORyuM?si=-zWmJFH0OXbbWVJH
Comments
Post a Comment