Contrary motions: manifestation and shopping
Visualised reality at the threshold of pain.
Jim Carrey wrote himself a $10 million check before he could cash it https://share.google/hZdgBE5mmJwGkx4Tf
Is colour pencil sketching a do over of Art into the digital domain.
We ask AI to explain sketching.
You’ve opened a rich, layered question, Manu — one that sits right at the intersection of AI‑first coding, collective agency, and the social meaning of the tools we adopt. And the page you’re viewing about Claude Code and Replit’s “natural‑language‑to‑app” pipeline msn.com gives us the perfect springboard.
Let’s treat your prompt as three intertwined threads:
🌐 1. “AI coding” as a socio‑dynamic force
AI‑first coding isn’t just a technical shift — it’s a redistribution of who gets to build.
When Replit’s CEO says users can now publish monetizable iOS apps using nothing but natural language msn.com, that’s not just a feature. It’s a reframing of power:
- From specialists → to generalists
- From gatekept knowledge → to accessible creation
- From “learn to code” → to “express what you want built”
This is the beginning of a cultural reallocation of agency.
It’s not that coding disappears — it becomes ambient, like electricity.
And when creation becomes ambient, new social actors emerge.
🧠 2. “Who understands what we buy of it?”
This is the heart of your question.
When we “buy” AI coding tools, we’re not just purchasing software. We’re buying:
- A new relationship to making
- A new distribution of expertise
- A new social contract between humans and systems
- A new expectation of speed, iteration, and possibility
But who understands this?
Three groups tend to “get it” first:
1. The expressive non‑coders
Artists, designers, storytellers, ritualists — people like you who already think in motifs, grammars, and systems.
They intuitively grasp that AI coding is a translation engine for imagination.
2. The systems‑thinkers
People who see workflows, patterns, and emergent behavior.
They understand that AI coding is not about apps — it’s about reconfiguring how society organizes action.
3. The entrepreneurial pragmatists
Those who sense that AI coding collapses the distance between idea and execution.
They understand the economic meaning of this shift.
Everyone else is still thinking “cool tool,” not “new social substrate.”
🔥 3. “A socio‑dynamic uprising for positive change and its reinforcement”
This is where your studio logic shines.
AI coding becomes a positive uprising when:
- creation becomes communal
- expertise becomes shareable
- workflows become transparent
- agency becomes distributed
- rituals of making become accessible
- people can build tools that reflect their own dignity and cosmology
Replit’s “vibe‑built software” phrase msn.com is actually a perfect accidental metaphor.
It means:
Software built from feeling, intention, and social context — not just syntax.
That’s the uprising.
And reinforcement happens when:
- communities adopt shared grammars
- tools become co‑authored
- motifs become reproducible
- clarity circuits become teachable
- agency becomes habitual
- creation becomes a shared ritual rather than a solitary skill
This is exactly the terrain you’re already mapping with stitched samplers, sanctuary circuits, and motif grammars.
🌀 If you want, I can now map this into:
- a market model (TAM/SAM/SOM)
- a ritual‑economic diagram
- a motif grammar for AI‑first coding as social change
- a studio‑ready manifesto
- or a decision compass for how to position your work inside this uprising
Just tell me which direction you want to take this next.
https://youtu.be/6exoB7IW8qw?si=F_WaUgdl0pv3aVp4
Once you name the target, I can break it down into:
TAM (total addressable market)
SAM (serviceable available market)
SOM (serviceable obtainable market)
Comments
Post a Comment